Updated
How to Choose Lead Scoring Software (Without Wasting Six Months)
Your CRM is drowning in leads. Here's how to pick scoring software that actually identifies deals instead of just adding complexity.
You're Scoring Leads Wrong Right Now
Somewhere in your CRM, a lead has a score. Maybe it's a number out of 100. Maybe it's a color. Maybe it's just a prayer.
Your team probably disagrees on what the score means. Sales thinks a 70 means "hot, call today." Marketing thinks it means "maybe interested someday." Nobody's actually using the score to decide who to call.
This is the problem lead scoring software claims to solve. And most of it doesn't. It just makes your problem more complicated and charges you $300/month to do it.
Here's how to actually choose one.
First: Do You Even Need Scoring Software?
Honest question. Most teams under 15 people don't.
Lead scoring software is for teams with so many leads that you literally can't evaluate them manually. If you're getting 20 qualified leads a week, you don't need AI. You need five minutes and a gut call.
If you're getting 200 qualified leads a week, you have a different problem. Now you need something systematic. Now scoring software makes sense.
Ask yourself: am I buying this because I have too many leads to evaluate manually? Or am I buying it because I feel like I should?
If it's the second one, stop. Go back to the manual process. Spend that $300/month on hiring an actual person to do the evaluation. You'll get better results.
If it's the first one, keep reading.
What Lead Scoring Actually Does (And Doesn't)
Lead scoring software looks at a prospect and tries to predict if they'll buy from you. It does this by looking at two types of data:
- Firmographic data. Company size, industry, location, revenue. The "who they are" stuff. This is easy to automate.
- Behavioral data. Did they open your email? Click a link? Visit your website? Download a resource? How many times? The "what they're doing" stuff. This is where scoring gets real.
Here's what it doesn't do: it doesn't tell you if they'll actually buy. It gives you a probability based on past patterns. If your past customers were mostly 50-person manufacturing companies that visited your pricing page three times before talking to sales, the software learns that pattern and scores similar prospects higher.
That's useful. But it's not magic. If you had bad customers in the past, the software will keep recommending bad customers.
The Three Types of Scoring Software
Type 1: Manual Scoring (Built Into Your CRM)
HubSpot, Pipedrive, Salesforce. They all let you set up scoring rules manually. "If company size is more than 50, add 20 points. If they opened an email, add 5 points. If they visited pricing page, add 15 points."
Pros: Free or built-in. You control every rule. Transparent. Easy to explain to your team.
Cons: You have to design the rules. You have to maintain them. If your customer profile changes, you have to update manually. It doesn't learn.
Best for: Teams under 20 people. Teams that have clear, unchanging customer profiles. Teams that want control over the logic.
Cost: $0 to $50/month (if you're already paying for the CRM).
Type 2: AI/Predictive Scoring (Standalone Tools)
Clearbit, 6sense, Demandbase, LeadIQ. These tools connect to your CRM and use machine learning to score automatically. You give them your customer data (closed deals, lost deals, active opportunities). The software looks for patterns and scores new prospects based on those patterns.
Pros: Learns automatically. Updates continuously. Unbiased (doesn't rely on your gut). Works with complex customer profiles.
Cons: Expensive. Requires clean historical data to work. Black box (you might not understand why something got scored low). Overkill for small teams.
Best for: Teams with 50+ sales reps. Teams with lots of historical data (100+ closed deals). Teams selling to enterprise or mid-market.
Cost: $500 to $2,000+/month.
Type 3: Behavioral Scoring (Intent Data Tools)
Apollo, Dight, Hunter, RocketReach. These aren't pure scoring tools. They're prospecting tools with scoring built in. They score based on what the prospect is doing right now: job changes, website traffic, social media activity, website form submissions.
Pros: Real-time intent signals. Not looking backward (past data), looking right now. Cheaper than enterprise AI tools. Works at any company size.
Cons: Only scores prospects you're already prospecting. Doesn't evaluate your existing pipeline. Requires you to actually look at the signals (not fully automated).
Best for: Prospecting-focused teams. Local service providers. Agencies. Teams that care about "when to call" more than "who to call."
Cost: $50 to $200/month.
How to Actually Choose One
Step 1: Count Your Leads
How many leads come in per month that your team has to evaluate? If it's under 100, you don't need software. If it's 100 to 500, you might need it. If it's over 500, you definitely need it.
Step 2: Define Your Best Customer Profile
What does your best customer actually look like? Not "we can help anyone." Be specific. 30 to 50-person companies. Manufacturing. In the Midwest. Budget over $50K. Visit your website at least three times before calling.
Write this down. If you can't write it down, you're not ready for scoring software. You need to solve this problem first.
Step 3: Pick Your Problem to Solve
Are you struggling with too many inbound leads that you can't evaluate? Use Type 3 (behavioral scoring) or Type 2 (AI scoring if you have the budget). You're trying to find signal in noise.
Are you struggling with poor sales efficiency? (Good leads, but sales reps aren't prioritizing the right ones?) Use Type 1 (manual) or Type 2 (AI). You're trying to guide your team.
Are you struggling with prospecting efficiency? (You send 1,000 cold emails and don't know who to follow up with?) Use Type 3 (behavioral). You're trying to find who's actually interested.
Step 4: Test the Tool's Data Quality
Before you buy, test it on 50 leads. Look at prospects you've already closed deals with. Does the tool score them high? Look at prospects you've rejected. Does it score them low? If it's doing the opposite, the tool is broken for your business.
This takes an hour. Do it. Most vendors will let you run a trial. Use it.
Red Flags That Kill Most Implementations
Red Flag 1: The Tool Doesn't Know Your Customer
You sell to small local plumbers. The tool has never seen a small local plumber before. It's trained on B2B SaaS data. It'll score wrong. Ask the vendor: "What's your training data? What industries do you specialize in?" If they're vague, walk.
Red Flag 2: You Don't Have Clean Historical Data
AI scoring needs good historical data to work. If half your closed deals aren't marked as "won" in your CRM, the tool will learn wrong patterns. Clean your data first. Then buy scoring software. Most teams try it the other way around and fail.
Red Flag 3: Implementation Takes More Than Two Weeks
If the vendor is promising a three-month implementation with custom setup, they're selling you consulting, not software. For most small to mid-size teams, scoring software should take four hours to set up. Max. If it's taking longer, the tool is too complicated.
Red Flag 4: The Vendor Can't Show You How Leads Are Scored
If it's a black box, it's dangerous. You need to understand why a lead got scored 45 instead of 65. If the vendor says "the AI decided," that's a cop-out. Ask: "Can I see the scoring factors? Can I see why this specific lead got this score?" If they can't, don't buy.
The Honest Reality
Most teams implement scoring software wrong. They think the score is a prediction of "will they buy?" It's not. It's a signal of "are they similar to people who bought from us in the past?"
That's useful. But it's not destiny. A low-scoring lead might still close. A high-scoring lead might still reject you. The score is a prioritization tool, not a fortune teller.
If your team treats scores like gospel (only call high scores), you'll miss deals. If they treat scores like noise (ignore them), you wasted money. The goal is middle ground: use scores to rank, not to reject.
The Setup That Actually Works
Here's the play most teams should use:
Start with Type 1 (manual scoring in your CRM). Spend one hour defining your customer profile and setting up scoring rules. Run it for 30 days. See if it helps your team prioritize.
If it does, keep it. You're done. Free or cheap. Problem solved.
If it doesn't, something's wrong with your understanding of your customer, not the tool. Go back to Step 2. Redefine who your best customers are.
Only after manual scoring is working should you consider Type 2 (AI) or Type 3 (behavioral). You'll know what you're looking for, and you'll avoid wasting money on the wrong tool.
Final Check
Before you sign a contract, ask yourself: would hiring one more sales person and paying them to evaluate leads manually be cheaper than this software?
If yes, hire the person.
If no, buy the software.
Most vendors never make you ask this question. They assume you want automation for its own sake. You don't. You want results. The tool is just a means to that.
Pick the simplest tool that solves your actual problem. Not the fanciest one. Not the one your competitor uses. The one that fits how you actually work.